321 Oak

Learning Techniques: The Learning Toolkit

Research-backed exercises and strategies for more effective learning, organized by stage: intake, scheduling, understanding, encoding, recall, and mastery.

A long, curved corridor of bookshelves filled with brightly colored book spines, lit by warm overhead lights, viewed from a low angle along the curve.
Photo: Susan Q Yin / Unsplash

Anyone struggling to learn something new, or to learn more efficiently, can do so using these techniques. These are research backed exercises and strategies to more effectively get new information stored in your brain in a useable way.

Know before you start: If you haven’t already, please check out The Learning Logistics Center which describes how your brain works like a warehouse. It will help you understand which stages of learning each of these exercises are targeting.

Let’s start by defining learning: Learning is the process of understanding a new thing, getting it into your long term memory, and getting it out of memory whenever you need it. The goal of learning is to be able to effortlessly recall information, and to be able use it in new and creative ways.

  1. Intake and scheduling (The Loading Dock)
  2. Understanding and Chunking (The Assembly Area)
  3. Elaboration and Encoding (The Warehouse Aisles)
  4. Discrimination (The Order Desk)
  5. Recall and Reconsolidation (The Pickers)
  6. Diffuse Mode (The Second Shift)
  7. Sleep and Maintenance (The Night Shift)
  8. Fluency and Mastery (Automation)
  9. The More You Know (Continuous Process Improvement)

The Short Version:

Detailed instructions:

Everything in this toolkit is research-backed. None of it is intuitive - which is exactly why most people don’t do it naturally, and why the approaches that feel productive (re-reading, highlighting, cramming) mostly aren’t. If you work through the stages as described, whether you’re the one learning or the one teaching, you should see real results. Learning is a skill. This is how you build it.


Sources
  1. Cepeda, Nicholas J., Edward Vul, Doug Rohrer, John T. Wixted, and Harold Pashler. "Spacing Effects in Learning: A Temporal Ridgeline of Optimal Retention." Psychological Science 19, no. 11 (2008): 1095-1102.
  2. Kornell, Nate, Matthew Jensen Hays, and Robert A. Bjork. "Unsuccessful Retrieval Attempts Enhance Subsequent Learning." Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 35, no. 4 (2009): 989-998.
  3. Roediger, Henry L., and Andrew C. Butler. "The Critical Role of Retrieval Practice in Long-Term Retention." Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15, no. 1 (2011): 20-27.
  4. Roediger, Henry L., and Jeffrey D. Karpicke. "Test-Enhanced Learning: Taking Memory Tests Improves Long-Term Retention." Psychological Science 17, no. 3 (2006): 249-255.
  5. Rohrer, Doug, and Kelli Taylor. "The Shuffling of Mathematics Problems Improves Learning." Instructional Science 35, no. 6 (2007): 481-498.